A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Understanding of and memory for a complex auditory event: an experimental case study to resolve an evidentiary issue in a trial
Authors: Pankkonen O, Kiiskinen K, Kaakinen JK, Santtila P
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Publication year: 2017
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Journal name in source: JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY
Journal acronym: J FORENSIC PSYCHI PS
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
First page : 70
Last page: 90
Number of pages: 21
ISSN: 1478-9949
eISSN: 1478-9957
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1261173
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/20569070?auxfun=〈=fi_FI
Abstract
While many studies have focused on eyewitness' perception and memory, few studies on earwitness' ability to understand and remember complex sound events have been conducted. The present study included 73 participants and explored whether it is possible for children and adults to understand and later recall a complex sound event. The aim was to resolve an evidentiary issue in a trial concerning a 7-year-old child's earwitness testimony and whether is it possible to understand a complex sound environment based solely on aural perception. The participants listened to a recording that replicated the aurally perceived situation described by the child witness in his testimony. The results showed, that adults and children could identify only a few, familiar sounds of the 16 sounds presented in free recall. They recognized the correct sounds poorly (51.9% vs. chance level of 50%): significantly better than chance only if the retention interval was immediate and the sounds could be heard clearly (57.5%). The results suggest that the participants were not able to understand what was transpiring and, thus, could not later recall the sound events. The findings highlight that understanding this kind of a complex sound event is a difficult task and that the experimental role of a witness psychologist is valuable for resolving evidentiary issues for the court. The implications for the case and the limitations of the study were discussed.
While many studies have focused on eyewitness' perception and memory, few studies on earwitness' ability to understand and remember complex sound events have been conducted. The present study included 73 participants and explored whether it is possible for children and adults to understand and later recall a complex sound event. The aim was to resolve an evidentiary issue in a trial concerning a 7-year-old child's earwitness testimony and whether is it possible to understand a complex sound environment based solely on aural perception. The participants listened to a recording that replicated the aurally perceived situation described by the child witness in his testimony. The results showed, that adults and children could identify only a few, familiar sounds of the 16 sounds presented in free recall. They recognized the correct sounds poorly (51.9% vs. chance level of 50%): significantly better than chance only if the retention interval was immediate and the sounds could be heard clearly (57.5%). The results suggest that the participants were not able to understand what was transpiring and, thus, could not later recall the sound events. The findings highlight that understanding this kind of a complex sound event is a difficult task and that the experimental role of a witness psychologist is valuable for resolving evidentiary issues for the court. The implications for the case and the limitations of the study were discussed.
UTU Research Portal