A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Markovianity and non-Markovianity in quantum and classical systems




TekijätVacchini B, Smirne A, Laine EM, Piilo J, Breuer HP

KustantajaIOP PUBLISHING LTD

Julkaisuvuosi2011

JournalNew Journal of Physics

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiNEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS

Lehden akronyymiNEW J PHYS

Artikkelin numeroARTN 093004

Vuosikerta13

Sivujen määrä26

ISSN1367-2630

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093004

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0138


Tiivistelmä
We discuss the conceptually different definitions used for the non-Markovianity of classical and quantum processes. The well-established definition of non-Markovianity of a classical stochastic process represents a condition on the Kolmogorov hierarchy of the n-point joint probability distributions. Since this definition cannot be transferred to the quantum regime, quantum non-Markovianity has recently been defined and quantified in terms of the underlying quantum dynamical map, using either its divisibility properties or the behavior of the trace distance between pairs of initial states. Here, we investigate and compare these definitions and their relations to the classical notion of non-Markovianity by employing a large class of non-Markovian processes, known as semi-Markov processes, which admit a natural extension to the quantum case. A number of specific physical examples are constructed that allow us to study the basic features of the classical and the quantum definitions and to evaluate explicitly the measures of quantum non-Markovianity. Our results clearly demonstrate several fundamental differences between the classical and the quantum notion of non-Markovianity, as well as between the various quantum measures of non-Markovianity. In particular, we show that the divisibility property in the classical case does not coincide with Markovianity and that the non-Markovianity measure based on divisibility assigns equal infinite values to different dynamics, which can be distinguished by exploiting the trace distance measure. A simple exact expression for the latter is also obtained in a special case.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 13:14