A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

Tracking of apolipoprotein B levels measured in childhood and adolescence: systematic review and meta-analysis




AuthorsStanesby Oliver, Zhou Zhen, Fonseca Ricardo, Kidokoro Tetsuhiro, Otahal Petr, Fraser Brooklyn J., Wu Feitong, Juonala Markus, Viikari Jorma S. A., Raitakari Olli T., Tomkinson Grant R., Magnussen Costan G.

PublisherSpringer Nature

Publication year2023

JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatrics

Journal name in sourceEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS

ISSN0340-6199

eISSN1432-1076

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05350-0

Web address http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00431%2D023%2D05350%2D0

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/182393243


Abstract

To quantify the tracking of apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels from childhood and adolescence and compare the tracking of apoB with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed in October 2023 (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42022298663). Cohort studies that measured tracking of apoB from childhood/adolescence (< 19 years) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using tracking estimates such as correlation coefficients or tracking coefficients, were eligible. Pooled correlations were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed with a review-specific tool. Ten studies of eight unique cohorts involving 4677 participants met the inclusion criteria. Tracking of apoB was observed (pooled r = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53–0.71; I2 = 96%) with no significant sources of heterogeneity identified. Data from five cohorts with tracking data for both lipids showed the degree of tracking was similar for apoB (pooled r = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.55–0.63) and LDL cholesterol (pooled r = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.47–0.68). Study risk of bias was moderate, mostly due to attrition and insufficient reporting.

Conclusion: ApoB levels track strongly from childhood, but do not surpass LDL cholesterol in this regard. While there is strong evidence that apoB is more effective at predicting ASCVD risk than LDL cholesterol in adults, there is currently insufficient evidence to support its increased utility in pediatric settings. This also applies to tracking data, where more comprehensive data are required.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:48