A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Minimal important change for Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)




AuthorsTapaninaho Krista, Uimonen Mikko, Saarinen Antti, Repo Jussi

Publication year2022

JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery

Volume28

Issue1

First page 44

Last page48

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.009

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.009


Abstract
Background

Although Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for foot and ankle conditions, research on its longitudinal validity is still needed. Minimal important change (MIC) values for the FAOS were determined using predictive modeling.

Methods

Overall, 134 patients that underwent operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions were included. An anchor based predictive logistic modeling method was used for estimating the MIC values for the FAOS subscales after surgery.

Results

Mean score changes in the improved and the unimproved groups were 17.7 and 0.43 points for Pain, 3.9 and −3.3 points for Symptoms, 21.3 and 1.8 points for Activities and daily living (ADL), 8.7 and −2.8 points for Sport, and 12.5 and −3.3 points for quality of life subscale, respectively. MIC was successfully determined to four out of five subgroups as follows: Pain 9.5 (94% CI −6.4 to 24.6); ADL 11.7 (95% CI −19.6 to 46.6); Sport (95% CI −10.4 to 15.4); QoL 5.0 (95% CI −2.6 to 12.9). The Symptoms subgroup presented with low MIC of 0.3 (95% CI −11.7 to 13.4) fitting to the measurement error.

Conclusion

ADL, Sports, Pain, and QoL subscales of the FAOS presented logical MIC values. The MIC can be further evaluated for specific conditions.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:57