A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal
Career Needs Assessment for Early Career Academic Surgeons Using a Modified Accelerated Delphi Process
Authors: Fleming Christina A., Augustinus Simone, Lemmers Daan H. L., Lopez-Lopez Victor, Nitschke Christine, Farges Olivier, Salminen Paulina, O'Connell P. Ronan, Campos Ricardo Robles, Caiazzo Robert
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Publication year: 2023
Journal: Annals of Surgery
Journal name in source: ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume: 278
Issue: 5
First page : 655
Last page: 661
ISSN: 0003-4932
eISSN: 1528-1140
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006014
Web address : https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/2023/11000/career_needs_assessment_for_early_career_academic.4.aspx
Introduction
Over the past 2 decades, physicians' wellbeing has become a topic of interest. It is currently unclear what the current needs are of early career academic surgeons (ECAS).
Methods
Consensus statements on academic needs were developed during a Delphi process, including all presenters from the previous European Surgical Association (ESA) meetings (2018-2022). The Delphi involved (1) a literature review, (2) Delphi form generation, and (3) an accelerated Delphi process. The Delphi form was generated by a steering group that discussed findings identified within the literature. The modified accelerated e-consensus approach included 3 rounds over a 4-week period. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement in any round.
Results
Forty respondents completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi. Median age was 37 years (interquartile range 5), and 53% were female. Majority were consultant/attending (52.5%), followed by PhD (22.5%), fellowship (15%), and residency (10%). ECAS was defined as a surgeon in 'development' years of clinical and academic practice relative to their career goals (87.9% agreement). Access to split academic and clinical contracts is desirable (87.5%). Consensus on the factors contributing to ECAS underperformance included: burnout (94.6%), lack of funding (80%), lack of mentorship (80%), and excessive clinical commitments (80%). Desirable factors to support ECAS development included: access to e-learning (90.9%), face-to-face networking opportunities (95%), support for research team development (100%), and specific formal mentorship (93.9%).
Conclusion
The evolving role and responsibilities of ECAS require increasing strategic support, mentorship, and guidance on structured career planning. This will facilitate workforce sustainability in academic surgery in the future.