A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Not realizing that you don't know: Fraction state anxiety is reduced by natural number bias




TekijätHalme Hilma, Van Hoof Jo, Hannula-Sormunen Minna, McMullen Jake

KustantajaBritish Psychological Society

Julkaisuvuosi2023

JournalBritish Journal of Educational Psychology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiThe British journal of educational psychology

Lehden akronyymiBr J Educ Psychol

eISSN2044-8279

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12637

Verkko-osoite https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12637

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181710704


Tiivistelmä

Background: Research has shown that mathematics anxi-ety  negatively  correlates  with  primary  school  mathematics  performance,  including  fraction  knowledge.  However,  re-cently no significant correlation was found between fraction arithmetic  performance  and  state  anxiety  measured  after  the  fraction  task.  One  possible  explanation  is  the  natural  number  bias  (NNB),  a  tendency  to  apply  natural  number  reasoning in fraction tasks, even when this is inappropriate. Students with the NNB may not realize they are answering incorrectly.

Aims: The  aim  is  to  examine  whether  a  misconception,  namely  the  NNB,  can  influence  students'  fraction  state  anxiety.

Sample: The  participants  were  119  fifth-  and  sixth-grade  students categorized as belonging to an NNB group (n = 60) or  a  No-NNB  group  (n =  59),  according  to  their  NNB-  related answering profile on a fraction arithmetic task.

Methods: Group differences were examined for state anxi-ety and performance on a fraction and a whole number arithmetic task and self-reported trait mathematics anxiety.Results: The NNB group reported lower fraction state anxiety than the No-NNB group, but there was no signifi-cant difference in trait mathematics anxiety. Furthermore, the NNB group reported lower fraction state anxiety than whole number state anxiety, while the opposite was true for the No-NNB group.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that students' per-ceptions of their own performance influence their state anx-iety responses, and students with a NNB may not be aware of their misconception and poor performance. Not taking into account qualitative differences in low performance, such as misconceptions, may lead to misinterpretations in state anxiety-performance relations.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 21:56