A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease




TekijätVisca D., Centis R., Pontali E., Zampogna E., Russell A.M., Migliori G.B., Andrejak C., Aro M., Bayram H., Berkani K., Bruchfeld J., Chakaya J.M., Chorostowska-Wynimko J., Crestani B., Dalcolmo M.P., D’Ambrosio L., Dinh-Xuan A.T., Duong-Quy S., Fernandes C., García-García J.M., de Melo Kawassaki A., Carrozzi L., Martinez-Garcia M.A., Martins P.C., Mirsaeidi M., Mohammad Y., Naidoo R.N., Neuparth N., Sese L., Silva D.R., Solovic I., Sooronbaev T.M., Spanevello A., Sverzellati N., Tanno L., Tiberi S., Vasankari Tuula, Vasarmidi E., Vitacca M., Annesi-Maesano I.

KustantajaInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Julkaisuvuosi2023

JournalInternational Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiInternational Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Vuosikerta27

Numero10

Aloitussivu729

Lopetussivu741

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0248

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0248

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181549460


Tiivistelmä

BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on ‘best practice’ care for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.

METHODS: A panel of international experts representing scientific societies, associations and groups active in post-COVID-19 lung disease was identified; 45 completed a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale indicated level of agreement with the draft standards. The final version was approved by consensus (with 100% agreement).

RESULTS: Four clinical standards were agreed for patients with a previous history of COVID-19: Standard 1, Patients with sequelae not explained by an alternative diagnosis should be evaluated for possible post-COVID-19 lung disease; Standard 2, Patients with lung function impairment, reduced exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life (QoL) or other relevant signs or ongoing symptoms ≥4 weeks after the onset of first symptoms should be evaluated for treatment and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); Standard 3, The PR programme should be based on feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness criteria, organised according to local health services and tailored to an individual patient’s needs; and Standard 4, Each patient undergoing and completing PR should be evaluated to determine its effectiveness and have access to a counselling/health education session.

CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of clinical standards for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. Our aim is to improve patient care and QoL by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing a PR programme to manage post-COVID-19 lung disease.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 21:59