A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Learning Collaborative Clinical Reasoning in Healthcare Education: An Integrative Review




TekijätHublin Linda, Koivisto Jaana-Maija, Lyyra Markus, Haavisto Elina

KustantajaW.B. Saunders

Julkaisuvuosi2023

JournalJournal of Professional Nursing

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJournal of Professional Nursing

Vuosikerta49

Aloitussivu126

Lopetussivu134

ISSN8755-7223

eISSN1532-8481

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.09.011

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.09.011

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181500151


Tiivistelmä

Background: Collaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) occurs when two or more healthcare professionals reflect and negotiate an issue regarding patient's situation or care. This represents a crucial learning goal that needs to be achieved during healthcare education.
Purpose: To describe the characteristics of and the pre-conditions for learning collaborative clinical reasoning in healthcare education.
Method: An integrative review was conducted. A systematic search was carried out in May 2020 (updated in August 2022) in four databases (CINAHL, Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Eric/EBSCO). Thirty-three peerreviewed research articles met the inclusion criteria and were included into a data quality appraisal and analysis. The data was analysed with inductive content analysis. Results: The characteristics of learning collaborative clinical reasoning were described using the following categories: 1) the collaborative clinical reasoning learning method 2) the collaborative clinical reasoning learning environment and 3) the collaborative clinical reasoning learners. The pre-conditions for learning collaborative clinical reasoning were described using the following categories: 1) the learning situation when learning collaborative clinical reasoning, 2) interaction when learning collaborative clinical reasoning and 3) clinical context when learning collaborative clinical reasoning. The learning situation includes the pedagogical preparation before the learning of collaborative clinical reasoning. The interaction consists of facilitation, feedback and peer communication during the learning of collaborative clinical reasoning. The clinical context utilized in the learning of collaborative clinical reasoning needs to be realistic and familiar for the students.
Conclusions: The results indicate that interventions enhancing collaboration and clinical reasoning apply a variety of learning methods, however there are certain characteristics of and pre-conditions for learning collaborative clinical reasoning to be considered.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 22:04