A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task
Tekijät: Koivisto Mika, Grassini Simone
Kustantaja: Springer Nature
Julkaisuvuosi: 2023
Journal: Scientific Reports
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Scientific reports
Lehden akronyymi: Sci Rep
Artikkelin numero: 13601
Vuosikerta: 13
Numero: 1
ISSN: 2045-2322
eISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181335285
Creativity has traditionally been considered an ability exclusive to human beings. However, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has resulted in generative AI chatbots that can produce high-quality artworks, raising questions about the differences between human and machine creativity. In this study, we compared the creativity of humans (n = 256) with that of three current AI chatbots using the alternate uses task (AUT), which is the most used divergent thinking task. Participants were asked to generate uncommon and creative uses for everyday objects. On average, the AI chatbots outperformed human participants. While human responses included poor-quality ideas, the chatbots generally produced more creative responses. However, the best human ideas still matched or exceed those of the chatbots. While this study highlights the potential of AI as a tool to enhance creativity, it also underscores the unique and complex nature of human creativity that may be difficult to fully replicate or surpass with AI technology. The study provides insights into the relationship between human and machine creativity, which is related to important questions about the future of creative work in the age of AI.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
