A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Digital mental health: challenges and next steps
Tekijät: Smith Katharine A., Blease Charlotte, Faurholt-Jepsen Maria, Firth Joseph, Van Daele Tom, Moreno Carmen, Carlbring Per, Ebner-Priemer Ulrich W., Koutsouleris Nikolaos, Riper Heleen, Mouchabac Stephane, Torous John, Cipriani Andrea
Kustantaja: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Julkaisuvuosi: 2023
Journal: BMJ Mental Health
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BMJ MENTAL HEALTH
Lehden akronyymi: BMJ MENTAL HEALTH
Artikkelin numero: e300670
Vuosikerta: 26
Numero: 1
Sivujen määrä: 7
eISSN: 2755-9734
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300670
Verkko-osoite: https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/26/1/e300670
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/181285179
Digital innovations in mental health offer great potential, but present unique challenges. Using a consensus development panel approach, an expert, international, cross-disciplinary panel met to provide a framework to conceptualise digital mental health innovations, research into mechanisms and effectiveness and approaches for clinical implementation. Key questions and outputs from the group were agreed by consensus, and are presented and discussed in the text and supported by case examples in an accompanying appendix. A number of key themes emerged. (1) Digital approaches may work best across traditional diagnostic systems: we do not have effective ontologies of mental illness and transdiagnostic/symptom-based approaches may be more fruitful. (2) Approaches in clinical implementation of digital tools/interventions need to be creative and require organisational change: not only do clinicians and patients need training and education to be more confident and skilled in using digital technologies to support shared care decision-making, but traditional roles need to be extended, with clinicians working alongside digital navigators and non-clinicians who are delivering protocolised treatments. (3) Designing appropriate studies to measure the effectiveness of implementation is also key: including digital data raises unique ethical issues, and measurement of potential harms is only just beginning. (4) Accessibility and codesign are needed to ensure innovations are long lasting. (5) Standardised guidelines for reporting would ensure effective synthesis of the evidence to inform clinical implementation. COVID-19 and the transition to virtual consultations have shown us the potential for digital innovations to improve access and quality of care in mental health: now is the ideal time to act.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |