Prognostic Relevance of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction




Chimed Surenjav, Stassen Jan, Galloo Xavier, Meucci Maria Chiara, Knuuti Juhani, Delgado Victoria, van der Bijl Pieter, Marsan Nina Ajmone, Bax Jeroen J.

PublisherEXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

2023

American Journal of Cardiology

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY

AM J CARDIOL

202

30

40

11

0002-9149

1879-1913

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.058

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914923004496?via%3Dihub

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/180524176



Patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are complex patients who often have a high prevalence of co-morbidities and risk factors. In the pres-ent study, we investigated the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) global longi-tudinal strain (GLS) along with important clinical and echocardiographic variables in patients with HFrEF. Patients who had a first echocardiographic diagnosis of LV systolic dysfunction, defined as LV ejection fraction & LE;45%, were selected. The study population was subdivided into 2 groups based on a spline curve analysis derived optimal threshold value of LV GLS (& LE;10%). The primary end point was occurrence of worsening HF, whereas the composite of worsening HF and all-cause death was chosen for the secondary end point. A total of 1,873 patients (mean age 63 12 years, 75% men) were analyzed. During a median follow-up of 60 months (interquartile range 27 to 60 months), 256 patients (14%) experienced worsening HF and the composite end point of worsening HF and all-cause mortality occurred in 573 patients (31%). The 5-year event-free survival rates for the primary and secondary end point were significantly lower in the LV GLS & LE;10% group compared with the LV GLS >10% group. After adjustment for important clinical and echocardiographic variables, baseline LV GLS remained independently asso-ciated with a higher risk of worsening HF (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.99, p = 0.032) and the composite of worsening HF and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.97, p = 0.001). In conclusion, baseline LV GLS is associated with long-term prognosis in patients with HFrEF, independent of various clinical and echocardiographic predictors.


Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 13:00