Other publication

Characteristics of incident substance-induced psychosis compared to incident first-episode psychosis. A nationwide register-linkage study




AuthorsJeyapalan Jeyaniroshan, Sassi Pihla, Mittendorfer-Rutz Ellenor, Tiihonen Jari, Taipale Heidi, Niemelä Solja

PublisherCambridge University Press, University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS

Publishing placeCambridge University Press, University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS

Publication year2022

Journal: European Psychiatry

Journal acronymEuropean Psychiatry

Article numberISSN: 0924-9338

VolumeVolume 66

IssueSpecial Issue S1

First page S955

Last pageS955

eISSN1778-3585

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2026

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-psychiatry/article/characteristics-of-incident-substanceinduced-psychosis-compared-to-incident-firstepisode-psychosis-a-nationwide-registerlinkage-study/9D90F8320E493319A3EECAA4F341B5AA


Abstract

Introduction

To date, most of the substance-induced psychosis (SIP) risk factor research has focused on meth/amphetamine use with cross-sectional study designs. Register-linkage studies, in turn, have focused mostly on the prognosis of SIP regarding mortality or conversion to schizophrenia. Far less is known about preceding factors before the incident SIP episode such as psychiatric comorbidity or work-related factors.

Objectives

There is no previous research on how persons with SIP differ from persons with other incident psychotic episodes (first-episode psychosis, FEP). This study aims to explore: 1) are their differences in previous psychiatric diagnoses and 2) work-related factors between SIPs and FEPs before the incident psychosis episodes.

Methods

The study covers extensive register-linkage data sets from Sweden. Incident SIP cases (n=7320) were identified from National Patient Register during the years 2006-2016 and matched 1:1 (age, gender, and calendar year) with incident FEP cases. Information from the sociodemographic background, psychiatric disorders, and work-related factors during the proceeding two-year period before the incident SIP/FEP episode were linked from national registries. SIPs vs FEPs were compared using logistic regression analysis, adjusted with education level, family situation, dwelling, country of origin and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Results

Previous self-harm (OR 2.3;95%CI 2.1-2.6), ADHD (OR 1.8;95%CI 1.6-2.0) and substance dependence diagnoses (OR 7.2;95%CI 6.6-7.9) were more prevalent among SIPs compared to FEPs. In turn, all other previous psychiatric disorder diagnoses were less prevalent among SIPs. Compared to FEPs, SIPs were more often unemployed (OR 1.2;95%CI 1.1-1.2) and had less any employment (OR 0.9, 95%CI 0.9-0.98), but also, they were less often on sickness abstinence over 180 days (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.9-1.3) The prevalence of previous substance use disorder was most common in alcohol SIP (OR 9.6;95%Cl 7.3-12.7).



Last updated on 27/03/2025 09:55:50 PM