Subjective experiences during dexmedetomidine- or propofol-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement sleep in healthy male subjects




Valli Katja, Radek Linda, Kallionpää Roosa .E., Scheinin Annalotta, Långsjö Jaakko, Kaisti Kaike, Kantonen Oskari, Korhonen Jarno, Vahlberg Tero, Revonsuo Antti, Scheinin Harry

PublisherElsevier Ltd

2023

British Journal of Anaesthesia

British Journal of Anaesthesia

131

2

348

359

1471-6771

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.026(external)

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.026(external)

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/180251079(external)



Background: Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep share common neural pathways and neurophysiological features. We hypothesised that these states bear resemblance also at the experiential level.

Methods: We compared, in a within-subject design, the prevalence and content of experiences in reports obtained after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep. Healthy males (N=39) received dexmedetomidine (n=20) or propofol (n=19) in stepwise doses to induce unresponsiveness. Those rousable were interviewed and left unstimulated, and the procedure was repeated. Finally, the anaesthetic dose was increased 50%, and the participants were interviewed after recovery. The same participants (N=37) were also later interviewed after NREM sleep awakenings.

Results: Most subjects were rousable, with no difference between anaesthetic agents (P=0.480). Lower drug plasma concentrations were associated with being rousable for both dexmedetomidine (P=0.007) and propofol (P=0.002) but not with recall of experiences in either drug group (dexmedetomidine: P=0.543; propofol: P=0.460). Of the 76 and 73 interviews performed after anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep, 69.7% and 64.4% included experiences, respectively. Recall did not differ between anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep (P=0.581), or between dexmedetomidine and propofol in any of the three awakening rounds (P>0.05). Disconnected dream-like experiences (62.3% vs 51.1%; P=0.418) and memory incorporation of the research setting (88.7% vs 78.7%; P=0.204) were equally often present in anaesthesia and sleep interviews, respectively, whereas awareness, signifying connected consciousness, was rarely reported in either state.

Conclusions: Anaesthetic-induced unresponsiveness and NREM sleep are characterised by disconnected conscious experiences with corresponding recall frequencies and content.

Clinical trial registration: Clinical trial registration. This study was part of a larger study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01889004).


Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 22:04