A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Short- and long-term risks of photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate: a population-based comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate




AuthorsSalmivalli Alisa, Ettala Otto, Nurminen Pertti, Kinnala Pekka, Boström Peter, Kytö Ville

PublisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

Publication year2023

JournalAnnals of Medicine

Journal name in sourceANNALS OF MEDICINE

Journal acronymANN MED

Volume55

Issue1

First page 1287

Last page1294

Number of pages8

ISSN0785-3890

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2192046

Web address https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2192046

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/179396466


Abstract
Background Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard surgical treatment for benign prostate enlargement (BPE). Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is an alternative, but there is limited real-life evidence of PVP risks. Objective To compare short- and long-term risks of PVP to those of TURP in the treatment of BPE. Materials and methods Consecutive patients who underwent elective PVP or TURP between 2006 and 2018 in 20 hospitals in Finland were retrospectively studied using a combination of national registries (n = 27,408; mean age 71 years). Short-term risks were postoperative mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and reoperations for bleeding. Long-term risks were reoperations for BPE or any urethral operations within 12 years. Differences between treatment groups were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Risks were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Results There were no differences in postoperative mortality or MACE between the study groups. Reoperations for bleeding were less frequent after PVP (0.9%, HR: 0.72, p = 0.042). Bleeding was more likely in patients with atrial fibrillation (number needed to treat [NNT] for PVP vs TURP: 61). Cumulative incidence for reoperation was higher after PVP (23.5%) than after TURP in long-term follow-up (17.8%; HR: 1.20, p < 0.0001, NNT: -31.7). Conclusions PVP is associated with lower postoperative bleeding risk but higher long-term reoperation risk than TURP. Patients with high bleeding risk and a low likelihood of needing reoperation appear most suitable for laser vaporization. KEY MESSAGE PVP is associated with lower postoperative bleeding risk but higher long-term reoperation risk than TURP. PVP appears an attractive treatment option, especially for patients with high bleeding risk and a low likelihood of needing a reoperation.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:33