A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Durability is improved by both low and high intensity endurance training




TekijätMatomäki Pekka, Heinonen Olli J., Nummela Ari, Laukkanen Jari, Auvinen Eero-Pekka, Pirkola Leena, Kyröläinen Heikki

KustantajaFRONTIERS MEDIA SA

Julkaisuvuosi2023

JournalFrontiers in Physiology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiFRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY

Lehden akronyymiFRONT PHYSIOL

Artikkelin numero 1128111

Vuosikerta14

Sivujen määrä14

eISSN1664-042X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128111

Verkko-osoitehttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128111/full

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/179338360


Tiivistelmä

Introduction:

This is one of the first intervention studies to examine how low- (LIT) and high-intensity endurance training (HIT) affect durability, defined as ‘time of onset and magnitude of deterioration in physiological-profiling characteristics over time during prolonged exercise’.

Methods:

Sedentary and recreationally active men (n = 16) and women (n = 19) completed either LIT (average weekly training time 6.8 ± 0.7 h) or HIT (1.6 ± 0.2 h) cycling for 10 weeks. Durability was analyzed before and after the training period from three factors during 3-h cycling at 48% of pretraining maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max): 1) by the magnitude and 2) onset of drifts (i.e. gradual change in energy expenditure, heart rate, rate of perceived exertion, ventilation, left ventricular ejection time, and stroke volume), 3) by the ‘physiological strain’, defined to be the absolute responses of heart rate and its variability, lactate, and rate of perceived exertion.

Results:

When all three factors were averaged the durability was improved similarly (time x group p = 0.42) in both groups (LIT: p = 0.03, g = 0.49; HIT: p = 0.01, g = 0.62). In the LIT group, magnitude of average of drifts and their onset did not reach statistically significance level of p < 0.05 (magnitude: 7.7 ± 6.8% vs. 6.3 ± 6.0%, p = 0.09, g = 0.27; onset: 106 ± 57 min vs. 131 ± 59 min, p = 0.08, g = 0.58), while averaged physiological strain improved (p = 0.01, g = 0.60). In HIT, both magnitude and onset decreased (magnitude: 8.8 ± 7.9% vs. 5.4 ± 6.7%, p = 0.03, g = 0.49; onset: 108 ± 54 min vs. 137 ± 57 min, p = 0.03, g = 0.61), and physiological strain improved (p = 0.005, g = 0.78). VO2max increased only after HIT (time x group p < 0.001, g = 1.51).

Conclusion:

Durability improved similarly by both LIT and HIT based on reduced physiological drifts, their postponed onsets, and changes in physiological strain. Despite durability enhanced among untrained people, a 10-week intervention did not alter drifts and their onsets in a large amount, even though it attenuated physiological strain.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:41