A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Screening for and Disclosure of Domestic Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of the PRICOV-19 Cross-Sectional Study in 33 Countries
Tekijät: Fomenko Elizaveta, Keygnaert Ines, Van Poel Esther, Collins Claire, Gómez Bravo Raquel, Korhonen Päivi, Laine Merja K, Murauskiene Liubove, Tatsioni Athina, Willems Sara
Kustantaja: MDPI
Julkaisuvuosi: 2023
Lehti:: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: International journal of environmental research and public health
Lehden akronyymi: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Artikkelin numero: 3519
Vuosikerta: 20
Numero: 4
ISSN: 1660-4601
eISSN: 1660-4601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043519
Verkko-osoite: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3519
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/179105522
The COVID-19 pandemic left no one untouched, and reports of domestic violence (DV) increased during the crisis. DV victims rarely seek professional help, yet when they do so, they often disclose it to their general practitioner (GP), with whom they have a trusting relationship. GPs rarely screen and hence rarely take the initiative to discuss DV with patients, although victims indicate that offering this opportunity would facilitate their disclosure. This paper aims to describe the frequency of screening for DV by GPs and disclosure of DV by patients to the GP during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify key elements that could potentially explain differences in screening for and disclosure of DV. The PRICOV-19 data of 4295 GP practices from 33 countries were included in the analyses, with practices nested in countries. Two stepwise forward clustered ordinal logistic regressions were performed. Only 11% of the GPs reported (much) more disclosure of DV by patients during COVID-19, and 12% reported having screened for DV (much). Most significant associations with screening for and disclosure of DV concerned general (pro)active communication. However, (pro)active communication was performed less frequently for DV than for health conditions, which might indicate that GPs are insufficiently aware of the general magnitude of DV and its impact on patients and society, and its approach/management. Thus, professional education and training for GPs about DV seems highly and urgently needed.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
