A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
Authors: Kero Katja, Hieta Niina, Kallonen Teemu, Ahtikoski Anne, Laine Hanna K, Rautava Jaana, Munukka Eveliina
Publisher: SPRINGER
Publication year: 2023
Journal: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Journal name in source: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal acronym: EUR J CLIN MICROBIOL
Volume: 42
First page : 201
Last page: 208
Number of pages: 8
ISSN: 0934-9723
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04545-x
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04545-x
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/178738714
Next-generation sequencing-based microbiological analysis is a complex way to profile vaginal microbiome samples since each step affects the results gained. Methodologies for sample collection lack golden standards. We compared Puritan DNA/RNA swab (PS) and Copan FLOQ swab (CS) and provided consistent and reliable microbiome profiles analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We collected two consecutive vaginal samples utilizing PS with room temperature storing and CS with instant freezing from 26 women. Variable region 4 of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with single PCR by custom-designed dual-indexed primers and sequenced with Illumina MiSeq system. Read quality control, operational taxonomic unit tables, and alpha and beta diversities analysis were performed, and community richness, diversity, and evenness were evaluated and compared between the two samplings and tests. Nineteen sample pairs produced detectable, intact DNA during the extraction protocol and/or further microbial profiles. Alpha bacterial diversity indices were independent on the collection protocol. No significant statistical differences were found in the measured beta diversity metrics between the collection methods. Of the women, 43% had Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome profile despite of collection method. Previously reported important vaginal microbiome phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria were present in the sample set although their relative abundances varied among individuals. PS and CS enable constant vaginal microbiota sampling. The PS method with no need for instant freezing is suitable for on-site collections at clinics. Furthermore, it seems to be possible to take two samples instead of one with constant microbiological results.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
