A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
The effects of Risk Factor‐Targeted Lifestyle Counselling Intervention on working‐age stroke patients' adherence to lifestyle change
Tekijät: Anne Oikarinen, Janne Engblom, Maria Kääriäinen, Helvi Kyngäs
Kustantaja: John Wiley & Sons
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Vuosikerta: 31
Numero: 3
Aloitussivu: 555
Lopetussivu: 568
Sivujen määrä: 14
ISSN: 1471-6712
eISSN: 1471-6712
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12369
Introduction
Since a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack is a major risk factor for a recurrent event, lifestyle counselling during the hospital phase is an essential component of treatment and may increase the probability of lifestyle change.
Aims and objectivesTo study the effect of risk factor-targeted lifestyle counselling intervention on working-age stroke patients' adherence to lifestyle changes.
DesignA quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group pretest–post-test design.
MethodsStroke patients in an acute neurological unit were divided into a control group (n = 75) receiving standard counselling and an experimental group (n = 75) receiving risk factor-targeted counselling. Lifestyle data and clinical outcomes were collected at hospital between January 2010 and October 2011, while data on adherence to lifestyle changes 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge.
ResultsThe baseline lifestyle habits did not differ significantly other than in alcohol behaviour. Both groups increased their intake, but the intervention group to a lesser degree. However, the experimental group significantly lost their weight for the first 3 and 6 months; at 3 months reduction in cigarette consumption and at 6 months significant increases in smoking cessation were also achieved. All improved some of their lifestyle habits. Intervention was associated with support from nurses as well as from family and friends. Adherence scores were higher in the experimental group.
ConclusionSome short-term advantages in lifestyle habits due to the intervention were noted. Participants in both groups improved some of their lifestyle habits.