A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The effects of Risk Factor‐Targeted Lifestyle Counselling Intervention on working‐age stroke patients' adherence to lifestyle change




AuthorsAnne Oikarinen, Janne Engblom, Maria Kääriäinen, Helvi Kyngäs

PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons

Publication year2017

JournalScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Journal name in sourceScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volume31

Issue3

First page 555

Last page568

Number of pages14

ISSN1471-6712

eISSN1471-6712

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12369


Abstract
Introduction

Since a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack is a major risk factor for a recurrent event, lifestyle counselling during the hospital phase is an essential component of treatment and may increase the probability of lifestyle change.

Aims and objectives

To study the effect of risk factor-targeted lifestyle counselling intervention on working-age stroke patients' adherence to lifestyle changes.

Design

A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group pretest–post-test design.

Methods

Stroke patients in an acute neurological unit were divided into a control group (n = 75) receiving standard counselling and an experimental group (n = 75) receiving risk factor-targeted counselling. Lifestyle data and clinical outcomes were collected at hospital between January 2010 and October 2011, while data on adherence to lifestyle changes 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge.

Results

The baseline lifestyle habits did not differ significantly other than in alcohol behaviour. Both groups increased their intake, but the intervention group to a lesser degree. However, the experimental group significantly lost their weight for the first 3 and 6 months; at 3 months reduction in cigarette consumption and at 6 months significant increases in smoking cessation were also achieved. All improved some of their lifestyle habits. Intervention was associated with support from nurses as well as from family and friends. Adherence scores were higher in the experimental group.

Conclusion

Some short-term advantages in lifestyle habits due to the intervention were noted. Participants in both groups improved some of their lifestyle habits.




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:42