A4 Refereed article in a conference publication

Assessment of Health Service Quality Through Electronic Health Record – A Scoping Review




AuthorsVon Gerich Hanna, Peltonen Laura-Maria

EditorsBrigitte Séroussi, Patrick Weber, Ferdinand Dhombres, Cyril Grouin, Jan-David Liebe, Sylvia Pelayo, Andrea Pinna, Bastien Rance, Lucia Sacchi, Adrien Ugon, Arriel Benis, Parisis Gallos

Conference nameMedical Informatics Europe

PublisherIOS Press BV

Publication year2022

JournalMedical informatics Europe

Book title Challenges of Trustable AI and Added-Value on Health

Journal name in sourceStudies in Health Technology and Informatics

Series titleStudies in health technology and informatics

Volume294

First page 520

Last page524

ISBN978-1-64368-284-6

eISBN978-1-64368-285-3

ISSN0926-9630

eISSN1879-8365

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220513

Web address https://ebooks.iospress.nl/doi/10.3233/SHTI220513

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/178640302


Abstract

Abstract. The World Health Organization defines, that high quality health services should be effective, safe, people-centered, timely, equitable, integrated, and effective. This requires systematic quality assessment. The aim of this scoping review was to explore how electronic health records (EHRs) have been used to assess quality of health services using the WHO criteria. A total of 4247 records were obtained whereof 8 studies were included in the review. Research showed that EHRs were used to evaluate safety, performance and care processes. EHRs were regarded as an applicable real-world data source, highlighting the importance of consistency and standardised terminologies. Use of EHR data is limited to its representation of the real world and current evaluation systems have limited quality criteria, diverse definitions and they use only structured data. Future research should explore possibilities of natural language processing methods and include narrative EHR information for a more a comprehensive view of service quality assessment.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:14