A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Promoting Physical Activity Among Children and Adolescents With Disabilities: The Translation of Policy to Practice Internationally




AuthorsSit Cincy, Aubert Salomé, Carty Catherine, Silva Diego Augosto Santos, López-Gil José Francisco, Asunta Piritta, Palad Yves, Guisihan Roselle, Lee Jeongmin, Nicitopoulos Kelly P Arbour, Vanderloo Leigh M, Stanish Heidi, Haegele Justin, Urbanski Piotr K, Pozeriene Jurate, Hutzler Yeshayahu, Ng Kwok

PublisherHUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC

Publication year2022

JournalJournal of Physical Activity and Health

Journal name in sourceJOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH

Journal acronymJ PHYS ACT HEALTH

Volume19

Issue11

First page 758

Last page768

Number of pages11

ISSN1543-3080

eISSN1543-5474

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2022-0351

Web address https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2022-0351


Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity among children and adolescents with disabilities (CAWD) is a global public health issue. Policy efforts to promote physical activity (PA) among CAWD have increased. This study summarizes the international policy trend for promoting PA among CAWD, with behavioral and policy insights specific to CAWD from country/regional indicators from the Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance Matrix on Physical Activity for Children and Adolescents to determine policy translation into practice.

Methods: International and national PA policy documents on CAWD were assessed. Data from the Global Matrix Para Report Cards on the behavioral and government indicators from 14 countries or regions (grouped by human development index) were reviewed and compared.

Results: Policy instruments began promoting PA for CAWD in 1989 via the Convention on the Rights of the Child. International policy has been advocating PA specifically for CAWD recently. In 2020, the World Health Organization published specific PA guidelines for CAWD. Data from the 14 Para Report Car found 14 grades on the average behavioral indicator and 12 on the government indicator. A gap between the average behavioral indicator (D-) and the government indicator (C+) was found in the Para Report Card data.

Conclusions: Although international policies are consistent in their attention to the needs of CAWD, national/regional policies vary. Coverage ranges from nonexistent to embedded in broader inclusion concepts. A gap in policies to promote PA of CAWD is prevalent and is more prominent in countries or regions with a lower human development index ranking.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:44