A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Single Center Experience with a 4-Week 177Lu-PSMA-617 Treatment Interval in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer




AuthorsKemppainen Jukka, Kangasmäki Aki, Malaspina Simona, Pape Bernd, Jalomäki Jarno, Kairemo Kalevi, Kononen Juha, Joensuu Timo

Publication year2022

JournalCancers

Article number6155

Volume14

Issue24

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246155

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/178068307


Abstract

Background: 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a promising theragnostic treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, both the optimal treatment dose and interval in mCRPC and the rate of identification of responders from non-responders among possible treatment candidates are unknown.

Methods: 62 men with mCRPC who were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 during 1/2017-2/2019 were included in the study. Treatment responses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were determined. The median follow-up time was 1.4 years (IQR 0.5-2.2). Tumor volume of metastases (MTV), SUVmax and tumor lesion activity (TLA) were quantitated from pre-treatment PSMA PET/CT images together with pre-treatment PSA.

Results: An average of three treatment cycles (2-5) were given within a four-week interval. PFS was 4.9 months (2.4-9.6) and OS was 17.2 months (6-26.4). There were no major adverse events reported. A significant PSA response of >50% was found in 58.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with longer OS, p < 0.004. PSA response was not associated with staging PSMA-derived parameters.

Conclusions: 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment in four-week intervals was safe and effective. Almost 60% of patients had a significant PSA response, which was associated with better OS. Pre-treatment PSA kinetics or staging PSMA PET/CT-derived parameters were not helpful in identifying treatment responders from non-responders; better biomarkers are needed to aid in patient selection.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 16:45