A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Dimension and impact of biases in funding for species and habitat conservation
Tekijät: Adamo M, Sousa R, Wipf S, Correia RA, Lumia A, Mucciarelli M, Mammola S
Kustantaja: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Journal: Biological Conservation
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Lehden akronyymi: BIOL CONSERV
Artikkelin numero: 109636
Vuosikerta: 272
Sivujen määrä: 8
ISSN: 0006-3207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109636
Tiivistelmä
Taxonomic and aesthetic biases permeate biodiversity conservation. We used the LIFE program-the European Union's funding scheme for the environment-to explore the economic dimension of biases in species-and habitat-level conservation. Between 1992 and 2020, animal species received three times more funding than plants. Within plants, species at northern latitudes, with broader ranges, and with blue/purple flowers received more funds regardless of their extinction risk. Conversely, species online popularity was only weakly positively associated with conservation expenditure. At the habitat-level, we found no relationship between expenditure and conservation status of the habitat. Our results can inform ways forward to achieve conservation goals that are comprehensive, sustainable, and cost-effective.
Taxonomic and aesthetic biases permeate biodiversity conservation. We used the LIFE program-the European Union's funding scheme for the environment-to explore the economic dimension of biases in species-and habitat-level conservation. Between 1992 and 2020, animal species received three times more funding than plants. Within plants, species at northern latitudes, with broader ranges, and with blue/purple flowers received more funds regardless of their extinction risk. Conversely, species online popularity was only weakly positively associated with conservation expenditure. At the habitat-level, we found no relationship between expenditure and conservation status of the habitat. Our results can inform ways forward to achieve conservation goals that are comprehensive, sustainable, and cost-effective.