A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Dimension and impact of biases in funding for species and habitat conservation




AuthorsAdamo M, Sousa R, Wipf S, Correia RA, Lumia A, Mucciarelli M, Mammola S

PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD

Publication year2022

JournalBiological Conservation

Journal name in sourceBIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION

Journal acronymBIOL CONSERV

Article number 109636

Volume272

Number of pages8

ISSN0006-3207

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109636


Abstract
Taxonomic and aesthetic biases permeate biodiversity conservation. We used the LIFE program-the European Union's funding scheme for the environment-to explore the economic dimension of biases in species-and habitat-level conservation. Between 1992 and 2020, animal species received three times more funding than plants. Within plants, species at northern latitudes, with broader ranges, and with blue/purple flowers received more funds regardless of their extinction risk. Conversely, species online popularity was only weakly positively associated with conservation expenditure. At the habitat-level, we found no relationship between expenditure and conservation status of the habitat. Our results can inform ways forward to achieve conservation goals that are comprehensive, sustainable, and cost-effective.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:32