A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Epidemiological Study of p16 Incidence in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 2005-2015 in a Representative Northern European Population




AuthorsMylly Mari, Nissi Linda, Huusko Teemu, Routila Johannes, Vaittinen Samuli, Irjala Heikki, Leivo Ilmo, Ventelä Sami

PublisherMDPI

Publication year2022

JournalCancers

Journal name in sourceCANCERS

Journal acronymCANCERS

Article number 5717

Volume14

Issue22

Number of pages15

eISSN2072-6694

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225717

Web address https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/22/5717

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/177448713


Abstract

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) has increased globally. Our research goal was to study HNSCC incidence in a representative Northern European population and evaluate the utility of the HPV surrogate marker p16 in clinical decision-making. All new HNSCC patients diagnosed and treated in Southwest Finland from 2005–2015 (n = 1033) were identified and analyzed. During the follow-up period, the incidence of oropharyngeal (OPSCC) and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) increased, while the incidence of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) decreased. This clinical cohort was used to generate a population-validated tissue microarray (PV-TMA) archive for p16 analyses. The incidence of p16 positivity in HNSCC and OPSCC increased in southwest Finland between 2005 and 2015. p16 positivity was mainly found in the oropharynx and was a significant factor for improved survival. p16-positive OPSCC patients had a better prognosis, regardless of treatment modality. All HNSCC patients benefited from a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, regardless of p16 expression. Our study reaffirms that p16 expression offers a prognostic biomarker in OPSCC and could potentially be used in cancer treatment stratification. Focusing on p16 testing for only OPSCC might be the most cost-effective approach in clinical practice.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 13:59