G5 Artikkeliväitöskirja
Economic Burden of Psoriasis
Tekijät: Mustonen Anssi
Kustantaja: Turun yliopisto
Kustannuspaikka: Turku
Julkaisuvuosi: 2015
ISBN: 978-951-29-6198-6
eISBN: 978-951-29-6199-3
Verkko-osoite: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-6199-3
Psoriasis may cause a substantial economic burden to patients, health service providers,
third parties, and the society as a whole. However, all of these costs may not be adequately
considered when assessing the treatment costs for psoriasis. Psoriasis may negatively
affect work productivity as psoriasis has a relatively high incidence in working age
people that lead to possible costs because of lost productivity.
The aims of this thesis were to estimate the economic burden of psoriasis particularly
from patients’ and health service providers’ perspectives and to estimate the background
factors (e.g., severity of psoriasis) that may have led to high costs. Another aim was to
estimate the total medication costs and to estimate psoriasis’ proportion of health-related
productivity losses.
The patient sample was based on patients with psoriasis who visited the Department of
Dermatology in Turku University Hospital during a one-year study period. These patients
were sent a questionnaire. From the patients who gave consent, medication information,
clinical information, and number of visits to Turku University Hospital were collected.
This data was linked to the information from the questionnaire.
Overall psoriasis was estimated to cause a substantial economic burden for the patient,
health service provider, health insurance system, employer, and the society as a whole.
The direct costs represented only a small proportion of the overall financial burden of
psoriasis, whereas indirect costs were significant. The estimated annual costs for patients
and employers were almost twice the costs to health service providers or the Social
Insurance Institution of Finland.
In conclusion, the cost contribution of patients and employers should be considered
when assessing the costs of different treatments, in addition to commonly studied direct
costs of medications and costs to health service providers. Methods used to assess these
costs should be well justified and be described clearly to allow comparisons between
studies and to evaluate the quality of the results.