A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Rational designing of quinazolin-4(3H)-one based ALR2 inhibitors: Synthesis and biological evaluation
Authors: Bhandu Priyanka, Verma Himanshu, Singh Manmeet, Kumar Manoj, Narendra Gera, Choudhary Shalki, Singh Pankaj Kumar, Silakari Om
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Publication year: 2022
Journal: Journal of Molecular Structure
Journal name in source: JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Journal acronym: J MOL STRUCT
Article number: 133825
Volume: 1270
Number of pages: 12
ISSN: 0022-2860
eISSN: 1872-8014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133825
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: No Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Partially Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133825
Zenarestat withdrawal from the clinical trials owing to severe renal toxicity was a major setback in de-veloping ALR2-targeted agents to manage diabetic complications. Addressing the toxicity issue by mak-ing some structural modifications in a well-known ALR2 inhibitor Zenarestat via a bioisosteric replace-ment/scaffold hopping approach can be very fruitful. This approach helps in obtaining a library of op-timized analogues that can be potential ALR2 inhibitors with minimal side effect. Herein, using scaffold hoping, quinazolin-4(3H)-one was obtained as one of the top bioisostere with good BIF, shape and field scores. The designed in-house library of quinazolin-4(3H)-one was studied for their SAR profile based on the developed qualitative model via Activity atlas option. Important field points i.e., positive and negative electrostatics along with shape properties were analyzed that are crucial for ALR2 inhibitory activity. Some structure-based approaches including molecular docking and dynamics also suggested that the de-signed quinazolin-4(3H)-one based derivatives can be putative ALR2 inhibitors. These molecules were synthesized and evaluated for in-vitro ALR2 inhibitory activity. It was observed that compound Q2, Q3 and Q10 are most potent inhibitors with IC50 values of 2.56 ± 0.03, 1.72 ± 0.02 and 1.47 +/- 0.03 mu M, respectively. Additionally, the predicted ADMET properties were also found to be favorable in comparison to Zenarestat.