A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

‘For a further union’: Conceptions of Unity in the Later W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot




AuthorsSwanepoel Charika

PublisherTaylor & Francis

Publication year2023

JournalEnglish Studies in Africa

Journal acronymESA

Volume66

Issue1

First page 1

Last page10

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2023.2128495(external)

Web address https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00138398.2023.2128495?scroll=top&needAccess=true(external)

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/176592290(external)


Abstract

This paper considers the shared preoccupation with unity in the later works of W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot with the aim of emphasizing the likeness in their thinking despite their vastly different theological stances. The unity strived for by both poets involves a dedicated resolution or transformation of contraries. Yeats scholars such as George Bornstein have termed Yeats’s dedication to all things opposite his ‘antinomial vision’ and Eliot scholars such as Jewel Spears Brooker refer to Eliot’s ‘dialectical imagination’. This paper is aimed at further developing the established view of these comparable tendencies by pointing to a three-part pattern that emerges from Yeats and Eliot’s later works. This pattern suggests a similar process behind their ‘antinomial vision’ and ‘dialectical imagination’ that entails: 1) a concern with opposites, 2) an ensuing inarticulacy, and 3) a capacity for incarnation. While this paper analyses Yeats and Eliot’s individual contributions, it draws broad philosophical patterns between them and illustrates the similarities and parallels that incidentally emerge from the comparison.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:12