A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Management of obstructive sleep apnea in Europe-A 10-year follow-up
Tekijät: Fietze Ingo, Laharnar Naima, Bargiotas Panagiotis, Basoglu Ozen K, Dogas Zoran, Drummond Marta, Fanfulla Francesco, Gislason Thorarinn, Gouveris Haralampos, Grote Ludger, Hein Holger, Jennum Poul, Joppa Pavol, van Kralingen Klaas, Kvamme John Arthur, Lombardi Carolina, Ludka Ondrej, Mallin Wolfgang, Marrone Oreste, McNicholas Walther T, Mihaicuta Stefan, Montserrat Josep, Pillar Giora, Pataka Athanasia, Randerath Winfried, Riha Renata L, Roisman Gabriel, Saaresranta Tarja, Schiza Sophia E, Sliwinski Pawel, Svaza Juris, Steiropoulos Paschalis, Tamisier Renauld, Testelmans Dries, Trakada Georgia, Verbraecken Johan, Zablockis Rolandas, Penzel Thomas
Kustantaja: Elsevier
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Journal: Sleep Medicine
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: SLEEP MEDICINE
Lehden akronyymi: SLEEP MED
Vuosikerta: 97
Aloitussivu: 64
Lopetussivu: 72
Sivujen määrä: 9
ISSN: 1389-9457
eISSN: 1878-5506
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2022.06.001
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2022.06.001
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/176003629
Objective: In 2010, a questionnaire-based study on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management in Europe identified differences regarding reimbursement, sleep specialist qualification, and titration procedures. Now, 10 years later, a follow-up study was conducted as part of the ESADA (European Sleep Apnea Database) network to explore the development of OSA management over time.Methods: The 2010 questionnaire including questions on sleep diagnostic, reimbursement, treatment, and certification was updated with questions on telemedicine and distributed to European Sleep Centers to reflect European OSA management practice.Results: 26 countries (36 sleep centers) participated, representing 20 ESADA and 6 non-ESADA countries. All 21 countries from the 2010 survey participated. In 2010, OSA diagnostic procedures were performed mainly by specialized physicians (86%), whereas now mainly by certified sleep specialists and specialized physicians (69%). Treatment and titration procedures are currently quite homogenous, with a strong trend towards more Autotitrating Positive Airway Pressure treatment (in hospital 73%, at home 62%). From 2010 to 2020, home sleep apnea testing use increased (76%-89%) and polysomnography as sole diagnostic procedure decreased (24%-12%). Availability of a sleep specialist qualification increased (52%-65%) as well as the number of certified polysomnography scorers (certified physicians: 36%-79%; certified technicians: 20%-62%). Telemedicine, not surveyed in 2010, is now in 2020 used in diagnostics (8%), treatment (50%), and follow-up (73%). Conclusion: In the past decade, formal qualification of sleep center personnel increased, OSA diagnostic and treatment procedures shifted towards a more automatic approach, and telemedicine became more prominent.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
