A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Thermogenic responses to different clamped skin temperatures in cold-exposed men and women




AuthorsDumont Lauralyne, Lessard Raphael, Semeniuk Kevin, Chahrour Houssein, McCormick James J, Acosta Francisco M, Blondin Denis P, Haman François

PublisherAMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC

Publication year2022

JournalAJP - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Journal name in sourceAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY

Journal acronymAM J PHYSIOL-REG I

Volume323

Issue1

First page R149

Last pageR160

Number of pages12

eISSN1522-1490

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00268.2021

Web address https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00268.2021


Abstract

Despite many decades of research examining thermoregulatory responses under varying cold stresses in humans, very little is known about the variability in metabolic heat production and shivering activity. Here, we used a novel closed-loop mean skin temperature clamping technique with a liquid-conditioned suit to isolate the effects of mean skin temperature on the subjective evaluation of thermal sensation, heat production, shivering responses, and oxidative fuel selection in young, lean, and healthy men (n = 12) and women (n = 12). Our results showed a skin temperature-dependent increase in metabolic heat production (5.2 ± 1.2 kJ/min, 5.9 ± 1.5 kJ/min, and 7.0 ± 1.8 kJ/min with skin temperature maintained at 31 ± 0.1 °C, 29 ± 0.2 °C, and 27 ± 0.1 °C, respectively; P < 0.0001) and shivering intensity in both men and women [0.6 ± 0.1% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 1.1 ± 0.4% MVC, and 2.5 ± 0.7% MVC, respectively; P < 0.0001], including sex-dependent differences in heat production at all three temperatures (P < 0.005). Even when controlling for lean body mass and fat mass, sex differences persisted (P = 0.048 and P = 0.004, respectively), whereas controlling for differences in body surface area eliminated these differences. Interestingly, there were no sex differences in the cold-induced change in thermogenesis. Despite clamping skin temperature, there was tremendous variability in the rate of heat production and shivering intensity. Collectively this data suggests that many of the interindividual differences in thermogenesis and shivering may be explained by differences in morphology and body composition.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:32