A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Genetic risk of type 2 diabetes modifies the effects of a lifestyle intervention aimed at the prevention of gestational and postpartum diabetes




AuthorsHuvinen Emilia, Lahti Jari, Klemetti Miira M., Bergman Paula H., Räikkönen Katri, Orho-Melander Marju, Laivuori Hannele, Koivusalo Saila B.

PublisherSPRINGER

Publication year2022

JournalDiabetologia

Journal name in sourceDIABETOLOGIA

Journal acronymDIABETOLOGIA

Volume65

Issue8

First page 1291

Last page1301

Number of pages11

ISSN0012-186X

eISSN1432-0428

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05712-7

Web address https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-022-05712-7

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175906266


Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The aim of this study was to assess the interaction between genetic risk and lifestyle intervention on the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and postpartum diabetes.

Methods

The RADIEL study is an RCT aimed at prevention of GDM and postpartum diabetes through lifestyle intervention. Participants with a BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) and/or prior GDM were allocated to intervention and control groups before pregnancy or in early pregnancy. The study visits took place every 3 months before pregnancy, once in each trimester, and at 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postpartum. We calculated a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 50 risk variants for type 2 diabetes.

Results

Altogether, 516 participants provided genetic and GDM data. The PRS was associated with higher glycaemic levels (fasting glucose and/or HbA(1c)) and a lower insulin secretion index in the second and third trimesters and at 12 months postpartum, as well as with a higher occurrence of GDM and glycaemic abnormalities at 12 months postpartum (n = 356). There was an interaction between the PRS and lifestyle intervention (p=0.016 during pregnancy and p=0.024 postpartum) when analysing participants who did not have GDM at the first study visit during pregnancy (n = 386). When analysing women in tertiles according to the PRS, the intervention was effective in reducing the age-adjusted occurrence of GDM only among those with the highest genetic risk (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17, 0.82). The risk of glycaemic abnormalities at 12 months postpartum was reduced in the same group after adjusting additionally for BMI, parity, smoking and education (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.13, 0.97).

Conclusions/interpretation

Genetic predisposition to diabetes modifies the response to a lifestyle intervention aimed at prevention of GDM and postpartum diabetes. This suggests that lifestyle intervention may benefit from being tailored according to genetic risk.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:41