Other publication
Are bank capital requirements optimally set? Evidence from researchers’ views
Authors: Ambrocio Gene, Hasan Iftekhar, Jokivuolle Esa, Ristolainen Kim
Publisher: The European Money and Finance Forum SUERF
Publication year: 2020
Journal: SUERF Policy Brief
Number in series: 191
Web address : https://www.suerf.org/policynotes/16497/are-bank-capital-requirements-optimally-set-evidence-from-researchers-views
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175745294
This note discusses the findings of a global survey of 149 leading academic researchers on bank capital regulation. The median (average) respondent prefers a 10% (15%) minimum non-risk-weighted equity-to-assets ratio, which is considerably higher than the current requirement. North Americans prefer a significantly higher equity-to-assets ratio than Europeans. We find substantial support for the new forms of regulation introduced in Basel III. The best predictor of capital requirement preference is how strongly an expert believes that higher capital requirements would increase the cost of bank lending.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |