Other publication

Are bank capital requirements optimally set? Evidence from researchers’ views




AuthorsAmbrocio Gene, Hasan Iftekhar, Jokivuolle Esa, Ristolainen Kim

PublisherThe European Money and Finance Forum SUERF

Publication year2020

JournalSUERF Policy Brief

Number in series191

Web address https://www.suerf.org/policynotes/16497/are-bank-capital-requirements-optimally-set-evidence-from-researchers-views

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175745294


Abstract

This note discusses the findings of a global survey of 149 leading academic researchers on bank capital regulation. The median (average) respondent prefers a 10% (15%) minimum non-risk-weighted equity-to-assets ratio, which is considerably higher than the current requirement. North Americans prefer a significantly higher equity-to-assets ratio than Europeans. We find substantial support for the new forms of regulation introduced in Basel III. The best predictor of capital requirement preference is how strongly an expert believes that higher capital requirements would increase the cost of bank lending.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:36