A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
A systematic review and meta-analysis of bond strength studies associated with self-etching primer and HF acid etching of dental glass-ceramics
Tekijät: Awad Mohamed M, Alhalabi Feras, Alotaibi Nawaf, Alzamil Faisal, Binalrimal Sultan, Alrahlah Ali, Ahmed Mohammed H
Kustantaja: Elsevier Ltd
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Journal: International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
Vuosikerta: 118
eISSN: 1879-0127
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103216
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103216
Objective
This review aims to provide a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the effect of self-etching ceramic primer (SECP) on the resin–ceramic bond strength, as reported in published in-vitro studies.
Materials and methods
Three databases (MEDLINE “PubMed”, Scopus and Web-of-Science) were electronically searched to identify studies that evaluated the effect of SECP on the bond strength to glass-ceramics versus the conventional treatment (hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching + silane-primer (S) application). Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan version 5.4 software, Cochrane Collaboration; Copenhagen, Denmark using a random effect model, considering the bond strength evaluation after artificial aging.
Results
Thirty-six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, while only 18 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). Twenty-three studies (63.9%) of the included studies showed a medium-risk of bias. The meta-analysis results showed no statistically significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) between resin-ceramic bond strength achieved following SECP or HF + S treatment with micro-shear bond strength (μSBS), tensile bond strength (TBS), and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) evaluation. However, shear bond strength (SBS) evaluation showed significantly less bond strength of SECP compared with HF + S (p < 0.00001).
Conclusion
SECP application can effectively promote adequate resin–ceramic bonding despite its mild etching capacity. However, more in-vitro studies that involve long-term clinically relevant artificial aging, and further clinical studies are required before SECP can be considered as an alternative to the conventional surface treatment (HF + S) of glass-ceramic materials.