A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

Utility of Pentraxin-3 as a biomarker for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis




AuthorsAnand Sachit, Pakkasjärvi Niklas, Bajpai Minu, Krishnan Nellai, Goswami Chandramouli, Suominen Janne S, Yadav Devendra K, Goel Prabudh

PublisherSPRINGER

Publication year2022

JournalPediatric Surgery International

Journal name in sourcePEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL

Journal acronymPEDIATR SURG INT

Volume38

Issue8

First page 1105

Last page1112

Number of pages8

ISSN0179-0358

eISSN1437-9813

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05149-4

Web address https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05149-4

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175704372


Abstract

Purpose: To systematically summarize all relevant data and to define the current evidence on the utility of Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) as a biomarker for acute appendicitis (AA) in children.

Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies comparing the levels of PTX3 in patients with AA vs healthy controls or non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP). Mean differences were calculated for all outcomes and the inverse variance method was used for weighted mean difference. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black scale.

Results: Five comparative studies were included. Significantly elevated levels of PTX3 in cases with AA vs healthy controls (WMD: 9.56, 95% CI 7.24-11.88, p < 0.00001), and patients with AA vs NSAP (WMD: 8.05, 95% CI 6.81-9.29, p < 0.00001) were demonstrated. Similarly, in separate meta-analyses, the levels of PTX3 were significantly elevated in children with AA vs healthy controls (WMD: 11.18, 95% CI 10.03-12.34, p < 0.00001), and children with AA vs NSAP (WMD: 8.35, 95% CI 6.88-9.82, p < 0.00001).

Conclusions: PTX3-levels are elevated in AA, but differentiation between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis demands other methods.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:45