A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Clinical, Brain, and Multilevel Clustering in Early Psychosis and Affective Stages




TekijätDwyer Dominic B, Buciuman Madalina Octavia, Ruef Anne, Kambeitz Joseph, Sen Dong Mark, Stinson Caedyn, Kambeitz-Ilankovic Lana, Degenhardt Franziska, Sanfelici Rachele, Antonucci Linda A, Lalousis Paris Alexandros, Wenzel Julian, Urquijo-Castro Maria Fernanda, Popovic David, Oeztuerk Oemer Faruk, Haas Shalaila S, Weiske Johanna, Hauke Daniel, Neufang Susanne, Schmidt-Kraepelin Christia, Ruhrmann Stephan, Penzel Nora, Lichtenstein Theresa, Rosen Marlene, Chisholm Katharine, Riecher-Rössler Anita, Egloff Laura, Schmidt André, Andreou Christina, Hietala Jarmo, Schirmer Timo, Romer Georg, Michel Chantal, Rössler Wulf, Maj Carlo, Borisov Oleg, Krawitz Peter M, Falkai Peter, Pantelis Christos, Lencer Rebekka, Bertolino Alessandro, Borgwardt Stefan, Noethen Markus, Brambilla Paolo, Schultze-Lutter Frauke, Meisenzahl Eva, Wood StephenJ, Davatzikos Christos, Upthegrove Rachel, Salokangas Raimo KR, Koutsouleris Nikolaos; for the PRONIA Consortium

KustantajaAMER MEDICAL ASSOC

Julkaisuvuosi2022

JournalJAMA Psychiatry

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJAMA PSYCHIATRY

Lehden akronyymiJAMA PSYCHIAT

Vuosikerta79

Numero7

Aloitussivu677

Lopetussivu689

Sivujen määrä13

ISSN2168-622X

eISSN2168-6238

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1163

Verkko-osoitehttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2792519

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118078/


Tiivistelmä

IMPORTANCE Approaches are needed to stratify individuals in early psychosis stages beyond positive symptom severity to investigate specificity related to affective and normative variation and to validate solutions with premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk measures.

OBJECTIVE To use machine learning techniques to cluster, compare, and combine subgroup solutions using clinical and brain structural imaging data from early psychosis and depression stages.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multisite, naturalistic, longitudinal cohort study (10 sites in 5 European countries; including major follow-up intervals at 9 and 18 months) with a referred patient sample of those with clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), recent-onset psychosis (ROP), recent-onset depression (ROD), and healthy controls were recruited between February 1, 2014, to July 1, 2019. Data were analyzed between January 2020 and January 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A nonnegative matrix factorization technique separately decomposed clinical (287 variables) and parcellated brain structural volume (204 gray, white, and cerebrospinal fluid regions) data across CHR-P, ROP, ROD, and healthy controls study groups. Stability criteria determined cluster number using nested cross-validation. Validation targets were compared across subgroup solutions (premorbid, longitudinal, and schizophrenia polygenic risk scores). Multiclass supervised machine learning produced a transferable solution to the validation sample.

RESULTS There were a total of 749 individuals in the discovery group and 610 individuals in the validation group. Individuals included those with CHR-P (n = 287), ROP (n = 323), ROD (n = 285), and healthy controls (n = 464), The mean (SD) age was 25.1 (5.9) years, and 702 (51.7%) were female. A clinical 4-dimensional solution separated individuals based on positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, and functioning, demonstrating associations with all validation targets. Brain clustering revealed a subgroup with distributed brain volume reductions associated with negative symptoms, reduced performance IQ, and increased schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Multilevel results distinguished between normative and illness-related brain differences. Subgroup results were largely validated in the external sample.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this longitudinal cohort study provide stratifications beyond the expression of positive symptoms that cut across illness stages and diagnoses. Clinical results suggest the importance of negative symptoms, depression, and functioning. Brain results suggest substantial overlap across illness stages and normative variation, which may highlight a vulnerability signature independent from specific presentations. Premorbid, longitudinal, and genetic risk validation suggested clinical importance of the subgroups to preventive treatments.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:12