Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tai data-artikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (A1)
Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline
Julkaisun tekijät: Holmqvist K, Örbom SL, Hooge ITC, Niehorster DC, Alexander RG, Andersson R, Benjamins JS, Blignaut P, Brouwer AM, Chuang LL, Dalrymple KA, Drieghe D, Dunn MJ, Ettinger U, Fiedler S, Foulsham T, Van der Geest JN, Hansen DW, Hutton SB, Kasneci E, Kingstone A, Knox PC, Kok EM, Lee H, Lee JY, Leppänen JM, Macknik S, Majaranta P, Martinez-Conde S, Nuthmann A, Nyström M, Orquin JL, Otero-Millan J, Park SY, Popelka S, Proudlock F, Renkewitz F, Roorda A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Sharif B, Shic F, Shovman M, Thomas MG, Venrooij W, Zemblys R, Hessels RS
Kustantaja: SPRINGER
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Journal: Behavior Research Methods
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
Lehden akronyymi: BEHAV RES METHODS
Sivujen määrä: 53
ISSN: 1554-351X
eISSN: 1554-3528
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
Verkko-osoite: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175240390
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "empirically based minimal reporting guideline").
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
