A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Evidence of discontinuity between psychosis-risk and non-clinical samples in the neuroanatomical correlates of social function




AuthorsHaas Shalaila S, Doucet Gaelle E, Antoniades Mathilde, Modabbernia Amirhossein, Corcoran Cheryl M, Kahn René S, Kambeitz Joseph, Kambeitz-Ilankovic Lana, Borgwardt Stefan, Brambilla Paolo, Upthegrove Rachel, Wood Stephen J, Salokangas Raimo K R, Hietala Jarmo, Meisenzahl Eva, Koutsouleris Nikolaos, Frangou Sophia

PublisherElsevier Inc.

Publication year2022

JournalSchizophrenia research: cognition

Journal name in sourceSchizophrenia Research: Cognition

Volume29

eISSN2215-0013

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2022.100252

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2022.100252

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175207250


Abstract

Objective

Social dysfunction is a major feature of clinical-high-risk states for psychosis (CHR-P). Prior research has identified a neuroanatomical pattern associated with impaired social function outcome in CHR-P. The aim of the current study was to test whether social dysfunction in CHR-P is neurobiologically distinct or in a continuum with the lower end of the normal distribution of individual differences in social functioning.

Methods

We used a machine learning classifier to test for the presence of a previously validated brain structural pattern associated with impaired social outcome in CHR-P (CHR-outcome-neurosignature) in the neuroimaging profiles of individuals from two non-clinical samples (total n = 1763) and examined its association with social function, psychopathology and cognition.

Results

Although the CHR-outcome-neurosignature could be detected in a subset of the non-clinical samples, it was not associated was adverse social outcomes or higher psychopathology levels. However, participants whose neuroanatomical profiles were highly aligned with the CHR-outcome-neurosignature manifested subtle disadvantage in fluid (PFDR = 0.004) and crystallized intelligence (PFDR = 0.01), cognitive flexibility (PFDR = 0.02), inhibitory control (PFDR = 0.01), working memory (PFDR = 0.0005), and processing speed (PFDR = 0.04).

Conclusions

We provide evidence of divergence in brain structural underpinnings of social dysfunction derived from a psychosis-risk enriched population when applied to non-clinical samples. This approach appears promising in identifying brain mechanisms bound to psychosis through comparisons of patient populations to non-clinical samples with the same neuroanatomical profiles.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:36