A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Evaluation of three methods for delineation and attenuation estimation of the sinus region in MR-based attenuation correction for brain PET-MR imaging
Tekijät: Lindén Jani, Teuho Jarmo, Teräs Mika, Klén Riku
Kustantaja: BMC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2022
Journal: BMC Medical Imaging
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BMC MEDICAL IMAGING
Lehden akronyymi: BMC MED IMAGING
Artikkelin numero: 48
Vuosikerta: 22
Sivujen määrä: 14
ISSN: 1471-2342
eISSN: 1471-2342
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00770-0
Verkko-osoite: https://bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12880-022-00770-0
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175003069
Background
Attenuation correction is crucial in quantitative positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MRI) imaging. We evaluated three methods to improve the segmentation and modelling of the attenuation coefficients in the nasal sinus region. Two methods (cuboid and template method) included a MRI-CT conversion model for assigning the attenuation coefficients in the nasal sinus region, whereas one used fixed attenuation coefficient assignment (bulk method).
Methods
The study population consisted of data of 10 subjects which had undergone PET-CT and PET-MRI. PET images were reconstructed with and without time-of-flight (TOF) using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) as reference. Comparison was done visually, using DICE coefficients, correlation, analyzing attenuation coefficients, and quantitative analysis of PET and bias atlas images.
Results
The median DICE coefficients were 0.824, 0.853, 0.849 for the bulk, cuboid and template method, respectively. The median attenuation coefficients were 0.0841 cm-1, 0.0876 cm-1, 0.0861 cm-1 and 0.0852 cm-1, for CTAC, bulk, cuboid and template method, respectively. The cuboid and template methods showed error of less than 2.5% in attenuation coefficients. An increased correlation to CTAC was shown with the cuboid and template methods. In the regional analysis, improvement in at least 49% and 80% of VOI was seen with non-TOF and TOF imaging. All methods showed errors less than 2.5% in non-TOF and less than 2% in TOF reconstructions.
Conclusions
We evaluated two proof-of-concept methods for improving quantitative accuracy in PET/MRI imaging and showed that bias can be further reduced by inclusion of TOF. Largest improvements were seen in the regions of olfactory bulb, Heschl's gyri, lingual gyrus and cerebellar vermis. However, the overall effect of inclusion of the sinus region as separate class in MRAC to PET quantification in the brain was considered modest.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |