A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Automated detection of pulmonary embolism from CT-angiograms using deep learning




TekijätHuhtanen Heidi, Nyman Mikko, Mohsen Tarek, Virkki Arho, Karlsson Antti, Hirvonen Jussi

KustantajaBMC

Julkaisuvuosi2022

JournalBMC Medical Imaging

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiBMC MEDICAL IMAGING

Lehden akronyymiBMC MED IMAGING

Artikkelin numero 43

Vuosikerta22

Sivujen määrä10

ISSN1471-2342

eISSN1471-2342

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00763-z

Verkko-osoitehttps://bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12880-022-00763-z

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/175002468


Tiivistelmä

Background

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep neural network model in the automated detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) from computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) using only weakly labelled training data.

Methods

We developed a deep neural network model consisting of two parts: a convolutional neural network architecture called InceptionResNet V2 and a long-short term memory network to process whole CTPA stacks as sequences of slices. Two versions of the model were created using either chest X-rays (Model A) or natural images (Model B) as pre-training data. We retrospectively collected 600 CTPAs to use in training and validation and 200 CTPAs to use in testing. CTPAs were annotated only with binary labels on both stack- and slice-based levels. Performance of the models was evaluated with ROC and precision-recall curves, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, as well as positive and negative predictive values.

Results

Both models performed well on both stack- and slice-based levels. On the stack-based level, Model A reached specificity and sensitivity of 93.5% and 86.6%, respectively, outperforming Model B slightly (specificity 90.7% and sensitivity 83.5%). However, the difference between their ROC AUC scores was not statistically significant (0.94 vs 0.91, p = 0.07).

Conclusions

We show that a deep learning model trained with a relatively small, weakly annotated dataset can achieve excellent performance results in detecting PE from CTPAs.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:32