Two minds of credit professionals: accrual vs. cash accounting information




Seppänen Harri, Teinilä Timo

PublisherInderscience

2022

International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

INT J MANAG FINANC A

14

1

56

83

28

1753-6715

1753-6723

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2022.120933

https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJMFA.2022.120933

https://research.aalto.fi/files/99413690/Seppanen_Teinila_2022_IJMFA_aalto_2023.pdf



To explore in what ways and what elements of financial statement information is important for credit practitioners, we employ a survey method to obtain new evidence. We ask if there is evidence on the existence of two different types of views to accounting information, namely accrual accounting and cash accounting emphasis. The two views come out robustly throughout our analysis, and they are consistently linked both to credit professional's experience, and task complexity. We infer our evidence to be consistent with the explanations for co-existence of differential information preferences advanced in behavioural accounting literature related to individuals' cognitive constraints in use of accounting information. We discuss the implications of our results for credit professionals, accounting standard setters and researchers.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 13:01