A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Combining biological therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a Finnish multi-centre study




AuthorsEronen Heli, Kolehmainen Sara, Koffert Jukka, Koskinen Inka, Oksanen Pia, Jussila Airi, Huhtala Heini, Sipponen Taina, Ilus Tuire

PublisherTaylor and Francis [Commercial Publisher]

Publication year2022

JournalScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Journal name in sourceSCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY

Journal acronymSCAND J GASTROENTERO

Volume57

Issue8

First page 936

Last page941

Number of pages6

ISSN0036-5521

eISSN1502-7708

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2045350

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/174791578


Abstract

Background and aims: Therapy with two concomitant biologicals targeting different inflammatory pathways has emerged as a new therapy option for treatment refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy (DBT) are scarce and are investigated in this study.

Materials and methods: Data on all patients treated with a combination of two biologicals in four Finnish tertiary centres were collected and analysed. Remission was assessed by a physician on the basis of biomarkers, endoscopic evaluation and alleviation of symptoms.

Results: A total of 16 patients with 22 trials of DBT were included. Fifteen patients had Crohn's disease. The most common combination of DBT was adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (USTE; 36%) with median follow-up of nine months (range 2-31). Altogether seven (32%) patients were in remission at the end of follow-up and in two trials response to DBT was assessed to be partial with the relief of patient symptoms. In a total of four trials DBT reduced the need for corticosteroids. The majority of patients achieving a response to DBT were treated with the combination of ADA and USTE (56%). At the end of follow-up all nine (41%) patients responding to DBT continued treatment. Infection complications occurred in three patients (19%).

Conclusion: DBT is a promising alternative treatment for refractory IBD, and half of our patients benefitted from it. More data on the efficacy and safety of DBT are needed especially in long-term follow up.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:50