A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Identifying and predicting severe bronchiolitis profiles at high risk for developing asthma: Analysis of three prospective cohorts




TekijätFujiogi Michimasa, Dumas Orianne, Hasegawa Kohei, Jartti Tuomas, Camargo Carlos A.

KustantajaELSEVIER

Julkaisuvuosi2022

JournalEClinicalMedicine

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiECLINICALMEDICINE

Lehden akronyymiECLINICALMEDICINE

Artikkelin numero 101257

Vuosikerta43

Sivujen määrä13

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101257

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/174755048


Tiivistelmä

Background

Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of infants hospitalization in the U.S. and Europe. Additionally, bronchiolitis is a major risk factor for the development of childhood asthma. Growing evidence suggests heterogeneity within bronchiolitis. We sought to identify distinct, reproducible bronchiolitis subgroups (profiles) and to develop a decision rule accurately predicting the profile at the highest risk for developing asthma.

Methods

In three multicenter prospective cohorts of infants (age < 12 months) hospitalized for bronchiolitis in the U.S. and Finland (combined n = 3081) in 2007-2014, we identified clinically distinct bronchiolitis profiles by using latent class analysis. We examined the association of the profiles with the risk for developing asthma by age 6 -7 years. By performing recursive partitioning analyses, we developed a decision rule predicting the profile at highest risk for asthma, and measured its predictive performance in two separate cohorts.

Findings

We identified four bronchiolitis profiles (profiles A-D). Profile A (n = 388; 13%) was characterized by a history of breathing problems/eczema and non-respiratory syncytial virus (non-RSV) infection. In contrast, profile B (n = 1064; 34%) resembled classic RSV-induced bronchiolitis. Profile C (n = 993; 32%) was comprised of the most severely ill group. Profile D (n = 636; 21%) was the least-ill group. Profile A infants had a significantly higher risk for asthma, compared to profile B infants (38% vs. 23%, adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] 2.57, 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.63-4.06). The derived 4-predictor (RSV infection, history of breathing problems, history of eczema, and parental history of asthma) decision rule strongly predicted profile A-e.g., area under the curve [AUC] of 0.98 (95%CI 0.97 -0.99), sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI 0.96 -1.00), and specificity of 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0. 93) in a validation cohort.

Interpretation

In three prospective cohorts of infants with bronchiolitis, we identified clinically distinct profiles and their longitudinal relationship with asthma risk. We also derived and validated an accurate prediction rule to determine the profile at highest risk. The current results should advance research into the development of profile-specific preventive strategies for asthma.

Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 10:28