A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Late incidence and recurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement




AuthorsBjörn Rikhard, Nissinen Maunu, Lehto Joonas, Malmberg Markus, Yannopoulos Fredrik, Airaksinen KE Juhani, Hartikainen Juha EK, Nieminen Tuomo, Biancari Fausto, Gunn Jarmo, Kiviniemi Tuomas O

PublisherElsevier Inc.

Publication year2022

JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Journal name in sourceThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

Journal acronymJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Volume164

Issue6

First page 1833

Last page1843

ISSN0022-5223

eISSN1097-685X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.101

Web address https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522321005870?via%3Dihub

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/56328808


Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery. More knowledge is needed about long-term AF recurrence and adverse outcomes related to new-onset AF (NOAF) during the index hospitalization.

A total of 1073 patients underwent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement at the 4 participating hospitals (2002-2014). After the exclusion of patients with a history of any preoperative AF, the final study population included 529 patients in the bioprosthetic and 253 patients in the mechanical valve prosthesis cohort. Median follow-up time was 5.4 (interquartile range, 3.4-8.2) years in the combined cohort.

Altogether 333 (42.6%) patients had in-hospital NOAF and 250 (32.0%) AF after hospital discharge. In the mechanical cohort, 64 (25.3%) experienced in-hospital NOAF and 74 (29.2%) AF after hospital discharge, whereas in the bioprosthetic cohort, 269 (50.9%) patients had in-hospital NOAF and 176 (33.3%) AF after hospital discharge. Patients with NOAF during the index hospital stay had a multifold risk of AF after hospital discharge in the combined cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 3.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.82-4.81; P < .0001) as well as in both cohorts separately (bioprosthetic: HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.05-6.22; P < .001; mechanical: HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59-4.03; P < .001). Patients with an in-hospital NOAF also had a significantly higher adjusted risk of death during the follow-up in the mechanical (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.10-3.82; P = .025) and bioprosthetic (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.17-2.28; P = .004) valve prosthesis cohorts.

NOAF during the index hospitalization is associated with a 2- to 4-fold risk of later AF and 1.6- to 2.0-fold risk of all-cause mortality after mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:52