Refereed review article in scientific journal (A2)

A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching




List of AuthorsMetsäpelto Riitta-Leena, Poikkeus Anna-Maija, Heikkilä Mirva, Husu Jukka, Laine Anu, Lappalainen Kristiina, Lähteenmäki Marko, Mikkilä-Erdmann Mirjamaija, Warinowski Anu, Iiskala Tuike, Hangelin Sanna, Harmoinen Sari, Holmström Anni, Kyrö-Ämmälä Outi, Lehesvuori Sami, Mankki Ville, Suvilehto Pirjo

PublisherSPRINGER NATURE

Publication year2022

JournalEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Journal name in sourceEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Journal acronymEDUC ASSESS EVAL ACC

Volume number34

Issue number2

Start page143

End page172

Number of pages30

ISSN1874-8597

eISSN1874-8600

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09373-9

URLhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11092-021-09373-9

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/67870876


Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to specify the key competence domains perceived to be critical for the teaching profession and depict them as a comprehensive teacher competence model. An expert panel that included representatives from seven units providing university-based initial teacher education in Finland carried out this process. To produce an active construction of a shared understanding and an interpretation of the discourse in the field, the experts reviewed literature on teaching. The resulting teacher competence model, the multidimensional adapted process model of teaching (MAP), represents a collective conception of the relevant empirical literature and prevailing discourses on teaching. The MAP is based on Blömeke et al.’s, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13, (2015) model which distinguishes among teacher competences (referring to effective performance of teachers’ work), competencies (knowledge, skills, and other individual competencies underlying and enabling effective teaching), and situation-specific skills of perceiving, interpreting, and making decisions in situations involving teaching and learning. The implications of the MAP for teacher education and student selection for initial teacher education are discussed.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2023-17-02 at 08:31