A2 Review article in a scientific journal

Review: Economic evidence of preventive interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents - a systematic review




List of Authors: Vartiainen Anna-Kaisa, Kuvaja-Köllner Virpi, Rantsi Mervi, Rissanen Elisa, Luntamo Terhi, Kurki Marjo, Sourander André, Kankaanpää Eila

Publisher: WILEY

Publication year: 2021

Journal: Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Journal name in source: CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH

Journal acronym: CHILD ADOL MENT H-UK

Number of pages: 11

ISSN: 1475-357X

eISSN: 1475-3588

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/camh.12505

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12505


Abstract
Background Anxiety disorders are common in children and youth. Also, in prevention, be it universal, selective or indicated, economic evaluation supports decision-making in the allocation of scarce resources. This review identified and summarised the existing evidence of economic evaluations for the prevention of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Methods A systematic search was conducted on the EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane and PubMed databases. We included studies that focused on children and adolescents under 18 years of age, aimed to prevent anxiety disorders and presented an incremental analysis of costs and effectiveness. A registered checklist was used that assessed the quality of the included articles. Results The search yielded 1697 articles. Five articles were included in this review. Three were RCT-based, and two were model-based studies. Out of five included interventions, one was a universal school-based intervention, two selective interventions and two indicated interventions. Universal school-based prevention of anxiety was not cost-effective compared with usual teaching. Selective parent training and indicative child- and parent-focused CBT prevention were likely cost-effective compared with usual care or doing nothing. Conclusion Parent education and cognitive behaviour therapy interventions can be cautiously interpreted as being a cost-effective way of preventing anxiety in children and adolescents. However, the evidence is weakly related to cost-effectiveness as there are only a few studies, with relatively small sample sizes and short follow-ups.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2021-08-10 at 13:27