Refereed review article in scientific journal (A2)

Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a literature review and validation of contemporary findings




List of AuthorsKaipainen Aku L, Martoma Erik, Puustinen Tero, Tervonen Joona, Jyrkkänen Henna-Kaisa, Paterno Jussi J, Kotkansalo Anna, Rantala Susanna, Vanhanen Ulla, Leinonen Ville, Lehto Soili M, Iso-Mustajärvi Matti, Elomaa Antti-Pekka, Qvarlander Sara, Huuskonen Terhi J

PublisherSPRINGER WIEN

Publication year2021

JournalActa Neurochirurgica

Journal name in sourceACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA

Journal acronymACTA NEUROCHIR

Volume number163

Start page3353

End page3368

Number of pages16

ISSN0001-6268

eISSN0942-0940

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04940-x

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/67216779


Abstract

Background Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare disease of unknown aetiology related possibly to disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and characterised by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) causing optic nerve atrophy if not timely treated. We studied CSF dynamics of the IIH patients based on the available literature and our well-defined cohort.
Method A literature review was performed from PubMed between 1980 and 2020 in compliance with the PRISMA guideline. Our study includes 59 patients with clinical, demographical, neuro-ophthalmological, radiological, outcome data, and lumbar CSF pressure measurements for suspicion of IIH; 39 patients had verified IIH while 20 patients did not according to Friedman's criteria, hence referred to as symptomatic controls.
Results The literature review yielded 19 suitable studies; 452 IIH patients and 264 controls had undergone intraventricular or lumbar CSF pressure measurements. In our study, the mean CSF pressure, pulse amplitudes, power of respiratory waves (RESP), and the pressure constant (P0) were higher in IIH than symptomatic controls (p < 0.01). The mean CSF pressure was higher in IIH patients with psychiatric comorbidity than without (p < 0.05). In IIH patients without acetazolamide treatment, the RAP index and power of slow waves were also higher (p < 0.05). IIH patients with excess CSF around the optic nerves had lower relative pulse pressure coefficient (RPPC) and RESP than those without (p < 0.05).
Conclusions Our literature review revealed increased CSF pressure, resistance to CSF outflow and sagittal sinus pressure (SSP) as key findings in IIH. Our study confirmed significantly higher lumbar CSF pressure and increased CSF pressure waves and RAP index in IIH when excluding patients with acetazolamide treatment. In overall, the findings reflect decreased craniospinal compliance and potentially depleted cerebral autoregulation resulting from the increased CSF pressure in IIH. The increased slow waves in patients without acetazolamide may indicate issues in autoregulation, while increased P0 could reflect the increased SSP.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2022-07-04 at 16:20