A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Implementing psychology-based empathetic refutational interview training to support vaccine confident conversations for health workers; 
Tekijät: Holford, Dawn; Anderson, Emma C.; Gould, Virginia C.; Weil, Leonora G.; Wilson, Joanne; Ahmed, Rehana; Karlsson, Linda C.; Lewandowsky, Stephan
Kustantaja: Elsevier BV
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Public Health
Artikkelin numero: 106295
Vuosikerta: 256
ISSN: 0033-3506
eISSN: 1476-5616
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106295
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106295
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523723517
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Objective
It can be challenging for health workers to have conversations with the public about vaccination and address misinformation without evidence-based training. Our objective was to pilot and evaluate a programme to teach an evidence-based communication approach, the Empathetic Refutational Interview (ERI), developed to help health workers address vaccine misinformation while maintaining trust.
Study designThis mixed-methods study evaluated participants’ skills and confidence in the ERI before and after training and explored the feasibility of participants training others to use the ERI.
MethodsTen in-person, two-day workshops were conducted for 106 trainees in London, UK between October 2023 and November 2024. Participants were supported to adapt training content and pass it on (e.g., onward ERI training). Participants completed assessment and feedback questionnaires before and after the workshop and were emailed follow-up questionnaires at one month and three months after the workshop.
ResultsWe received 101 before-and-after questionnaire responses, and 42 and 35 responses to the follow-ups. Participants' confidence, preparedness, and skills in using the ERI for vaccine conversations improved significantly. In their feedback, participants cited better understanding of patients’ psychological motivations and the structure provided by the ERI framework as useful elements for their practice. Eighteen participants reported passing on ERI knowledge to colleagues; most onward ERI training featured a shorter version of the content delivered during the workshop.
ConclusionsThe training successfully equipped health workers with skills and confidence to approach vaccine conversations. However, few trainees were able to give in-depth ERI training to others without further support.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This project has received funding from the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme grant 964728 (JITSUVAX).
This work was supported by an ESRC (UKRI) Impact Acceleration Award (ES/X004392/1).
LK is supported by funding from the Turku Institute for Advanced Studies.
LW and JW were supported by funding from the NHSE London Legacy and Health Equity Partnership.