A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Changes in the transformative potential of action proposals in Finnish Red Lists from 1986 to 2019




TekijätArponen, Anni; Salomaa, Anna; Fabritius, Henna; Juslen, Aino; Kuusela, Saija

KustantajaWiley

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Conservation Biology

Artikkelin numeroe70312

ISSN0888-8892

eISSN1523-1739

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70312

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70312

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/523652031

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

Red lists provide critical knowledge regarding biodiversity decline, especially in Finland, where broad assessments have been made regularly since the 1980s. They deliver information on the threat status of species and ecosystems, propose actions to guide conservation policy, and have the potential to spur transformative change. We examined whether the transformative potential of the proposals has changed over time. We analyzed the contents qualitatively and quantitatively of seven Finnish Red Lists of Species or Ecosystems from 1986 to 2019. We used a prior analysis of transformative potential of conservation actions in the Conservation Measures Partnership classification (such as outreach or conservation designation and planning), which identified Meadows' sustainability leverage points (i.e., in complex systems, a point at which a small change can lead to large changes) associated with each action category. We also determined the number of proposals that overlapped with sectors beyond conservation. We used a nonparametric Mann-Kendall trend test and linear models to analyze temporal trends in the data. Cross-sectoral proposals increased over time, but there was only a small shift toward actions that influenced the root causes of biodiversity loss (i.e., deep leverage actions). In the qualitative assessment of how the actions were proposed to be implemented, actions became more complex and effectiveness of implementation increased, demonstrating a change within conservation action categories toward deeper leverage points. This increasing transformative potential can be a catalyst and a consequence of broader societal change driven by ongoing biodiversity loss. Red lists could play a role in transformative change, but the engagement of actors across society in devising action proposals must be inclusive and cover expertise from the social sciences and humanities. Our results emphasize the importance of considering complementary dimensions of transformative change simultaneously to achieve a comprehensive understanding of viable paths to societal change.

Keywords: Integración; Red List of Ecosystems; biodiversity policy; conservation actions; conservation interventions; intervenciones de conservación; leverage points; lista roja de ecosistemas; mainstreaming; medidas de conservación; paradigmas; paradigms; política de biodiversidad; puntos de influencia. 


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
We are grateful to three anonymous reviewers, U.-M. Liukko, and E. Hyvarinen for their constructive comments on the manuscript and to O. Ojala for information provided on the funding of the Ministry of the Environment. We acknowledge the Kone Foundation for funding (grants 201710221 and 202203652 to A.A. and grants 201710505 and 202010642 to A.S.). The setup of the FinEst Centre for Smart Cities (HF) is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under the grant agreement 856602, by the European Regional Development Fund and the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research.


Last updated on