A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Statistically significant chuckles: who is using humour at scientific conferences?




TekijätMammola, Stefano; Fontaneto, Diego; Santangeli, Andrea; Oswald, Krista Natasha; Correia, Ricardo; Meierhofer, Melissa B.; De Santis, Vanessa; Stout, Victoria

KustantajaRoyal Society Publishing

Julkaisuvuosi2026

Lehti: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Artikkelin numero20253000

Vuosikerta293

Numero2067

ISSN0962-8452

eISSN1471-2954

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.3000

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoite https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.3000

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/516091528

Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssiCC BY

Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versioKustantajan versio


Tiivistelmä

We’ve all been there: 11.47, swamped by a long stretch of dense scientific talks at a conference. Six slides into a hyper-technical presentation, the speaker suddenly cracks a joke. The room erupts. Shoulders relax. Minds re-engage. Humour is a powerful but underused tool in scientific communication, often sidelined by academic norms that view levity as unprofessional. Social biases can further shape who feels safe joking without risking credibility. At 14 biology-related conferences, we collected data on humour use across 531 talks. Jokes clustered at the beginnings and ends of talks, with an extra bump in successful jokes midway through. Most jokes (66%) earned only polite chuckles. Humour success was unrelated to the type of joke or form of delivery; however, male speakers told about 0.35 more jokes per talk, and both male and native speakers had a 10% higher probability of eliciting laughter. This suggests how social dynamics influence who feels comfortable using humour and whose jokes resonate with the audience. Until academia reckons with these biases, humour will remain a privilege. Still, for those brave enough or granted the social licence, a well-placed zinger can turn a forgettable talk into one people actually remember—and perhaps even enjoy.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
S.M and D.F. acknowledge support of NBFC, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, PNRR, Missione 4 Componente 2, 'Dalla ricerca all’impresa', Investimento 1.4, Project CN00000033. The present research was carried out within the framework of the activities of the Spanish Government through the 'Maria de Maeztu Centre of Excellence' accreditation to IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB) (CEX2021- 001198). A.S. was supported by a 'Ramón y Cajal' fellowship (RYC2022-036239-I). R.C.acknowledges support from the Research Council of Finland (grant agreement no. 348352) and the KONE Foundation (grant agreement no. 202101976).


Last updated on