A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (Tmd): Enhancing Sensitivity in Diagnosing Headache Attributed to Tmd (A Multi‐Centre Study)
Tekijät: Nykänen, Laura; Kämppi, Antti; Durham, Justin; Eli, Ilana; Freidman‐Rubin, Pessia; Keren, Lihi; Näpänkangas, Ritva; Shalev Antshel, Tamar; Tanner, Johanna; Teerijoki‐Oksa, Tuija; Winocur, Ephraim; Sipilä, Kirsi; Emodi‐Perlman, Alona
Kustantaja: Wiley
Julkaisuvuosi: 2026
Lehti: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
ISSN: 0305-182X
eISSN: 1365-2842
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70166
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Osittain avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70166
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/515660220
Rinnakkaistallenteen lisenssi: CC BY
Rinnakkaistallennetun julkaisun versio: Kustantajan versio
Background
The brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (bDC/TMD) was developed to simplify the original DC/TMD for wider clinical use. While its diagnostic accuracy for most painful TMDs is acceptable, the sensitivity for headache attributed to TMD (HaTMD) was reported to be poor.
ObjectivesTo improve the diagnostic sensitivity of HaTMD within the bDC/TMD framework by reintroducing selected examination items from the original DC/TMD protocol.
MethodsThis retrospective multicentre study used data from Finland and Israel. The cohort included 114 individuals previously diagnosed with HaTMD according to the DC/TMD and with myalgia and/or arthralgia diagnoses in both DC/TMD and bDC/TMD. Four examination items excluded from the bDC/TMD—E1b (headache location in temple), E4c (familiar headache on assisted opening), E5a/b (lateral movements) and E5c (protrusive movements)—were reintroduced individually. Four calibrated examiners reassessed each modified dataset. Inter-examiner reliability (Cohen's kappa) and diagnostic sensitivity were calculated using DC/TMD as the gold standard.
ResultsInter-examiner reliability for HaTMD diagnosis was almost perfect (κ = 0.81–1.00) across all items. Sensitivity improved markedly from the previously reported 0.16–0.38 to 0.82 (E1b)–0.90 (E5c). Item E1b (temple headache confirmation) was present in 95% of Finnish and 86% of Israeli cases, identifying it as the most representative finding.
ConclusionReintroducing item E1b into the bDC/TMD examination substantially increases the diagnostic sensitivity for HaTMD while maintaining brevity. Refinement of the painful TMD diagnostic decision tree and prospective validation of the modified bDC/TMD are recommended to ensure reliability and clinical applicability.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This work was supported by Head and Neck Center, Helsinki University Hospital.